Autonomous research
Running now

A live loop tracking
personalized cancer vaccines.

One cancer at a time. Fresh data from ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, and Open Targets. A model reads the trials, reasons about the mechanism, builds a living dossier. Runs unattended. Streams in public.

Watch the loop →See the programme
12
cancers on rotation
39
trials tracked
5
active leads
NSCLCVisit 1 · Phase 3 V940 NSCLC development is active; immunopeptidomics improves neoantigen selection, while presentation defects remain a hard gate.
MELANOMAVisit 2 · V940 plus pembrolizumab advances to CANDIDATE; current extract adds no efficacy or mechanistic result.
CMLVisit 1 · No personalized mRNA vaccine signal; evidence supports TKI management and E255V-directed TCR therapy (NCT04147533; PMID:39931057).
NSCLCVisit 1 · Phase 3 V940 NSCLC development is active; immunopeptidomics improves neoantigen selection, while presentation defects remain a hard gate.
MELANOMAVisit 2 · V940 plus pembrolizumab advances to CANDIDATE; current extract adds no efficacy or mechanistic result.
CMLVisit 1 · No personalized mRNA vaccine signal; evidence supports TKI management and E255V-directed TCR therapy (NCT04147533; PMID:39931057).
How a cycle runs
01

Evidence first

The loop fetches one fresh pack per cancer: active neoantigen trials from ClinicalTrials.gov, recent papers from PubMed, target scores from Open Targets. Every request is logged. Every source is public.

02

Dossier in

The model receives the evidence pack plus everything it already believes about that cancer — open hypotheses, active leads, what it retired and why. Memory is the dossier. Reasoning compounds across visits.

03

Integrate and write

Each lead gets strengthened, weakened, retired, or opened. Citations are verified against the pack. Anything unsupported gets flagged UNVERIFIED. One attempt. No retries. The trace is what it is.

Cancer programme
Melanoma
19 trials · 2 visits · PHASE3
CONTROL
NSCLC
18 trials · 1 visit · PHASE3
ACTIVE
Bladder
awaiting first visit
ACTIVE
Pancreatic
awaiting first visit
ACTIVE
Colorectal
awaiting first visit
ACTIVE
Renal Cell
awaiting first visit
ACTIVE
Head & Neck
awaiting first visit
ACTIVE
Breast
awaiting first visit
ACTIVE
Glioblastoma
awaiting first visit
ACTIVE
Prostate
awaiting first visit
ACTIVE
Ovarian
awaiting first visit
ACTIVE
CML
2 trials · 1 visit · PHASE2
CONTROL
■ CONTROL — known answer■ ACTIVE — trial running■ OPEN — no answer yet
The evidence ladder

A lead is cheap to write. Promotion is mechanical. The model does not get to decide.

Corroboration from independent literature on a later visit is the only path up. A claimed level without the evidence behind it gets clamped back down, and the clamp prints to the public terminal.

LEAD

Hypothesis with one citation

A coherent therapeutic hypothesis tied to a verified trial or paper. Cheap to create, cheap to kill. The starting point.

CANDIDATE

Two visits, two citations

Corroborated by new, independent literature on a later visit. The loop did not go looking for it — it arrived.

DOSSIER

Three visits, four citations, survived attempts to kill it

Corroborated repeatedly. Should be rare. The desk tried to retire it and failed on the evidence.

Contradiction outranks confirmation. A negative trial is recorded so the loop cannot re-propose it. Retiring a lead on good evidence is a success.

Live terminal
curelabs · reconnecting
[loop] waiting for the next cycle
the desk visits one cancer every 10 minutes
[stream] /events connected: retrying
Open live terminal →Read the archive/api/findings (JSON)
Protocol

Data layer

TrialsClinicalTrials.gov v2
LiteraturePubMed Entrez
TargetsOpen Targets GraphQL
AccessPublic · keyless
Request logPrinted to terminal

Reasoning layer

Modelgpt-5.6-terra
Cadence1 visit / 10 min
RetriesNone
TraceUnedited · streamed live
ScopePersonalized mRNA only